China’s Monetary Policy Should Not Be Criticised


Contrary to the conventions and misguided wisdom, China is wrongly criticized for not allowing her currency to float. This is absolutely misguided and is based on the simple, yet incorrect, assumption that the more Chinese goods cost, the less quantity of them the USA will buy, and the cheaper USA goods are, the more quantity of USA products the USA can sell. The theory goes that if currencies float freely, trade deficits will decrease, and more Americans will get jobs. Historically, this hasn’t worked. Closer examination of the underlying theory explains why. If the Chinese currency floats freely, we in the USA will just spend more money for the same amount of goods, further aggravating our balance of trade deficit.

At the theoretical level, it assumes that certain goods are like freely tradeable, completely available commodities like Gold. A bar of gold is a bar of gold, and there is an ample supply if you are willing to pay for it. Chinese goods, like oil, are not similar commodities where market forces will solve all problems. There is a limited supply of oil, regardless of the price. The US is in no position to substitute domestic production of goods for cheaper imported goods, especially those imported from China.

First and foremost, given what we in the USA pay and buy for Chinese goods, a price increase will not diminish demand. We will just pay more money for the same things, and thus have less money for others. Why is this? Because imported Chinese goods are not substitutable for USA made goods. Whether a Chinese worker is paid $1,000 US Dollars a month for wages, or $1,200 a month for wages, we still can’t compete. Our workers are simply not prepared to work in factories for minimum wage and produce low cost goods.

USA economic strength lies in higher end, high technology goods, which is the reason the USA should focus our policies on education and on research into cutting edge technologies and into supporting the later. For example, the airline industry is a perfect example. Since the invention of the airline, until Airbus, only the USA manufactured and produced the largest and most technology advanced aircraft, especially for commercial (non-military) uses.

There are other structural reasons as well. Our economy is structural and not easily changed. Even if the price of goods suddenly shot up, we can’t just build factories for low cost substitutes for imported Chinese products.

Imported oil is a perfect example. We need what we need, and we will purchase what we need, as long as we have the money to do so. Being an affluent country, we have many assets. When the price of oil rises, as it has, we do not stop driving or filling our gas tanks. The tremendous rise in the costs of a gallon of gasoline caused us to complain and hurt our wallet, but we have not cut our use of our automobile.

Not allowing their currency to float actually hurts the Chinese. By selling their goods at an artificially low price, they are only throwing away hard currency revenues which would make their country richer and more affluent. Since quantity of exports won’t diminish, we would just pay more for each item exported. The Chinese would have more money without losing exports. There mistake is the USA’s benefit, and that is a shame. Because we have no one to blame but ourselves (in the USA) and our complacency and laziness. On the other hand, no people have suffered so extensively (much of which suffering was at the hands of foreign powers including the Western countries and their allies) as much as the Chinese for thousands of years, yet are so decent and hardworking and ethical. They have an ancient culture which was prescient and enlightened and very ethical which remains engrained in the lives of the Chinese to this day. They remain poor and suffering, and deserve to have decent lives.

Link to Go to the Main Page of My Google Blog

E-Mail Me

 

About davidmginsberg

This is a more limited, more international version of my full blog, which is currently on Google. It may replace my entire blog since Google's Blogger is blocked, I understand, in China (even though my Blog is favorable to China), and China is of interest to me. My full blog is currently at http://usa-china-international.blogspot.com/ and a link to it with more information about me is at http://www.chinablognetwork.com/general/david-ginsberg-international-and-domestic-blog. This is ironic that a Blog site in China, listing China related sites, lists my blog, but prohibits Chinese people from visiting my Blog, which, at worst, has posts which have nothing to do with China, and at worst, has blogs which speak favorably of China.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s